Rethinking the Election Process Dispute Resolution Model to Implement the Election Justice Principle

Herdi Munte; Yuliandri .; Runtung Sitepu; Mirza Nasution

doi:10.63332/joph.v5i6.2264

Rethinking the Election Process Dispute Resolution Model to Implement the Election Justice Principle

Authors

Herdi Munte Mahasiswa, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Suumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Yuliandri . Dosen, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
Runtung Sitepu Profesor, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Mirza Nasution Dosen, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2264

Keywords:

Redesign, Model, Election Resolution, Principle of Justice

Abstract

The implementation of the 2019 and 2024 elections was conducted simultaneously on the same day to elect the president and vice president, as well as the legislative bodies at the central level (DPR and DPD) and at the regional level (Provincial and District/City DPRD), because the design of the implementation is normatively regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning general elections (Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections). The research method used to analyze the case involves several approaches, namely the legal approach and the case approach related to the relevant theme. That the results of the research explain that the regulation of the principle of electoral justice is not significantly addressed in Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

Munte, H., ., Y., Sitepu, R., & Nasution, M. (2025). Rethinking the Election Process Dispute Resolution Model to Implement the Election Justice Principle. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2264