Evaluation in Professional Practices in Dentistry

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define categories and properties, and to propose theoretical and methodological guidelines for the evaluation of professional practices in dentistry from a cyclical and integrative perspective. A complementary methodology divided into two phases was used: (i) qualitative research phase, with an experiential epistemological approach, applying Grounded Theory through a process of coding and analysis, to develop a system of emerging categories and sub-categories, validated through interviews with experts and focus groups, ensuring the relevance and accuracy of the data collected. (ii) Quantitative research phase: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 checklist, through the analysis of studies to generate value judgements on the process and outcomes of the training project. The statistical analysis was obtained through databases such as Scopus, Scielo, Redalyc and LILACS, allowing the integration of the results of professional practices, curricular guidelines and training cycles. The cyclical and integrative approach in the design of professional practices, proposes a continuous, systematised and recursive training process, for constant improvement in the teaching-learning process, adjusting to a specific context and favouring a robust and adaptive professional training.