International Arbitration in Theory and Practice: Global Standards and the Case of Kosovo

Authors

  • Skender Gojani Professor at AAB College - Faculty of Law, Pristina
  • Isuf Jahmurataj Professor at AAB College - Faculty of Law, Pristina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1530

Keywords:

International Arbitration, Trade Dispute, Alternative Procedure, New York Convention, UNCITRAL Model Law, ICC, LCIA, ICSID, Private Adjudication, Impartial Resolution.

Abstract

International arbitration has become one of the most important mechanisms for resolving disputes in international trade and investment relations. This paper provides a detailed examination of the concept, functioning, and advantages of arbitration as an alternative to traditional courts. Through analysis of international legal sources such as the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law, as well as the rules of key institutions such as the ICC, LCIA, and ICSID, the paper elaborates on the forms, procedures, and practical impact of arbitration. It further explores the advantages and shortcomings of this method, as well as Kosovo’s position in this field. The methodology includes theoretical analysis, comparative approaches, and interpretation of international practices. This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview for students, professionals, and policymakers on the importance of arbitration in the international legal order.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-07

How to Cite

Gojani, S., & Jahmurataj, I. (2025). International Arbitration in Theory and Practice: Global Standards and the Case of Kosovo. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(5), 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1530

Issue

Section

Articles